Showing posts with label impact fees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label impact fees. Show all posts

Thursday, March 1, 2018

BikeWalkLee's Letter to County Commissioners in Support of 100% Impact Fees


 On Tuesday, March 6th, the County Commissioners will be considering whether impact fees should return to the 100% rate or continue its impact fee reduction policies, which has resulted in the loss of $83 million in revenues over the past 5 years.  BikeWalkLee strongly supports returning to the 100% impact fees and has shared our comments with Commissioners.  Make your voices heard before or at this important meeting on Tuesday. Here's the Link to this Letter.





March 1, 2018

Lee County Board of Commissioners
2120 SW Main Street
Fort Myers, FL 33901

Dear Commissioners: 
BikeWalkLee, a coalition working to complete Lee County's streets, works for a more balanced multi-modal transportation system that values transportation choice, connectivity, economic opportunity, livable communities, community character, safety, and quality growth.  Over the past six years, we have steadfastly opposed the suspension or reduction in impact fees.  We believe that providing public infrastructure should be a shared responsibility; that investments in public infrastructure necessitated by growth should be paid for by those creating that need;  and that infrastructure investments should keep pace with permitted development so that the quality of life for all residents does not erode as a result.

At your March 6 Board meeting, we urge you:

·        To take no action to extend reduced impact fees, so that the full base rate (100%) is automatically reinstated effective March 16, 2018, as called for in your March 2015 ordinance;

·        To adopt the recommendations in the 2018 Duncan Associates impact fee studies (roads, schools, parks, fire/EMS), updating the 100% rates reflecting current costs;

·        To oppose any efforts to lengthen the impact fee update cycle beyond the current long-standing practice of updating the fees on a three-year cycle. 

When the Board enacted the reduced collection rate (20% for two years) in 2013, and then extended it in 2015 (with a reduced collection rate of 45% for three years), the ordinances stated that these reductions were to provide temporary relief to the building and construction industry in recognition of the downturn in the U.S. economy. The downturn in the economy is long over, with employment and growth booming in Lee County, and it's past time for the "temporary relief" to come to an end.
This "temporary relief" has come at a high cost to the taxpayers. As a result of this Board's policy decisions (supported by all Board members with the exception of Commissioner Mann) to reduce impact fee collection rates over the past five years, $83 million in revenues has been lost (approximately half for roads as well as parks; and the other half for schools). Public infrastructure costs due to permitted development are determined by state-mandated impact fee studies which establish the base impact fees. According to these studies (e.g. Duncan Update studies), $128 million is necessary to cover the public infrastructure costs associated with these developments, yet the county collected only $45 million of that amount, creating a $83 million unfunded liability for the taxpayers of Lee County. [See Attachment 1.]
Now the Board is considering a proposal to extend this 45% collection rate for another five years, which would result in an additional estimated loss of $122 million ($24 million a year), bringing the 10-year revenue loss to over $200 million (half for schools and other half for roads and parks). [See Attachment 2.]  If this 45% collection rate becomes permanent (as the majority of the Commission clearly intends), by 2040, the County will have lost an additional $400 million in revenue...for a grand total of $600 million (half for schools and half for roads and parks)! It is fiscally irresponsible of the Board to give away a vital revenue source necessary to meet the public infrastructure needs of this growing county, even more so because no replacement revenue sources have been put in place to cover these costs. 

During the 24 years from when road impact fees were instituted (FY 1990 through FY 2013, when slashing of impact fees began), this revenue source constituted about one-third of all revenues funding transportation projects. As a result of the Board's impact fee reduction policy decisions over the past five years, that share has dropped from 36% to 10%. It is time to re-assert the community compact of shared responsibility that served the county well for the previous 24 years, and return impact fees to 100% of the base rate. [See Attachment 3.]

In addition to the detrimental impacts from the past five years' $83 million revenue loss, there has been an even more lasting casualty: In the Board's attempt to justify slashing impact fees, it has created a false narrative that there are sufficient revenues to meet the transportation needs of this growing community. Nothing could be further from the truth. 

The countywide long range transportation plan (2040 LRTP) approved in 2015 by the MPO Board (consisting of all 5 Commissioners along with elected officials from each of the 6 municipalities), clearly sounded the alarm about the growing transportation funding shortfall. Less than half of the projects in the approved list can be funded with the estimated revenues coming in through 2040. For the LRTP projects that are solely the responsibility of Lee County, there is a $1.2 billion shortfall over the next 22 years, with 55% of the need left unfunded. This is half of the $2.3 billion shortfall  in the overall Plan. Furthermore, as the MPO's LRTP made clear, the upward pressure on project costs coupled with worsening downward trends on almost all revenue sources, the transportation funding shortfall with be significantly higher when the 2045 LRTP is adopted in 2019. [See Attachment 4.]  

The County Administration has argued that it has "solved" the funding shortfall problem with its Growth Increment Fund (GIF).  This is not true.  First, no new revenues have been raised.  GIF simply shifts approximately $11 million/year in already collected property tax revenues (from all residents) to the transportation CIP every year; thereby shifting who is paying for this infrastructure.  Second and most importantly,  even with these GIF revenues, the funding shortfall has only been reduced to $864 million-- with  41% of the funding shortfall remaining.  

Restoring impact fees to 100% will make a big dent in the shortfall (closing half of the gap), but the County will still be faced with  a remaining 23% funding shortfall ($481 million).  As has been discussed by the MPO, new revenue sources are needed and it is the responsibility of local leaders to come up with solutions; yet nothing has been done. Through its actions to reduce impact fee revenue collections, this Board has made an already dire funding situation much worse. [See Attachment  5.]

The Board's exclusive focus on the Transportation CIP's five-year window is very deceptive. In order to create the impression that no additional funds are needed, it simply pushes the true costs of completing these projects into the outyears beyond the "visible" five-year window, hiding the fact that sufficient revenues are not available to complete these projects. 

Using the County's own numbers--the FY 2017-18 5-Year Transportation CIP (adopted in Sept. 2017)and its revenue estimates (provided in Feb. 6, 2018 workshop), just to complete construction of the projects already underway in the current 5-year CIP (totaling $244 million) an additional $225 million is needed, as shown the County's "6-10 year" column on its detailed CIP spreadsheet. This means that over 80% of the revenues coming in for the next 5-year window (FY 22/23-26/27) are already committed for the completion of the projects now underway.  Only $55 million will be available to spend on all the unfunded Tier II and III projects, which have a $165 million price tag.

The reality is that it will take over 15 years to fund all the projects in the current five-year CIP and on the county's approved Tier I, II, and III priorities list.  No funds will be available for any new projects until  FY 2032/33 -- 14 years from now, by which time Lee County will have another 182,000 residents on top of our current population of 700,000. [See Attachment 6.]

In addition to these "big picture" transportation funding concerns, BikeWalkLee is particularly concerned about the consequences of this funding shortfall on the growing backlog of stand-alone bike/ped retrofit projects, as well as road projects that incorporate a complete streets approach. In 2017, Lee County was ranked the deadliest metro area in the country for pedestrian safety. [The 2016 Dangerous by Design report released by Smart Growth America.] This report demonstrated the urgent need for increased investment in pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure to make Lee County roadways safer for all users. A year ago, BikeWalkLee challenged the County along with the six local municipalities, to step up their investments to make our roadways safer for everyone. Without these additional investments now, we are likely to see our "worst in the country" label stick when the next report comes out next year, hurting Lee County's reputation well beyond this one issue. Safety is essential to one's quality of life, and without it, our economic vitality cannot be sustained. 

While the County has provided some increased funding for bike/ped projects, much more needs to be done. As of January 2018, there are $105 million in bike/ped stand-alone projects that have been approved and prioritized by the County's Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee waiting to be funded. In addition, there are $38 million more in approved projects that are currently on hold until other issues are resolved.  The list of approved projects has grown from $68 million in FY 2015, essentially doubling over the past 3 years. To eliminate this backlog, and to make our existing roadways  safer for pedestrians and cyclists, significant additional revenues are needed in the transportation budget over the next 15 years and beyond. [See Attachment  7.] 
The Board needs to be honest with the citizens of Lee County about the growing transportation funding shortfall rather than pretending it doesn't exist so the Board can squander much needed revenues by only collecting a fraction of impact fees due to the county and school district. The Board's actions on this critical issue over the past five years have misled the public about the true transportation funding situation and undermined the long-standing social compact of "shared sacrifices" that is critical to the public's trust in its elected officials, making it even harder to gain public support for these efforts in the future.
Economic prosperity comes from quality investments in community infrastructure. We urge you to vote to return impact fees to the full 100% rate, as updated by the 2018 Duncan impact fee update studies. 

Sincerely, 

Darla Letourneau
On behalf of
BikeWalkLee

cc: Roger Desjarlais, County Manager

Attachments:




Attachment  4:  Lee County/BoCC Approved Projects in 2040 LRTP





Friday, October 9, 2015

Action Alert: Important votes on Long Range Transportation Plan at Oct. 16th Lee MPO Board meeting

The Lee MPO's 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) process is coming into the home stretch and there's another opportunity for citizens to participate--the Oct. 16th MPO Board meeting in the Cape Coral City Hall. At this meeting, the Board will review and approve the draft cost feasible transportation projects to be included in the 2040 LRTP. The LRTP item will include Board consideration of recommendations from both its Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC),including the CAC recommendation that impact fees be increased to the full amount. The Board will also review the draft FDOT 5-year workplan and provide comments to FDOT.

MPO Board Meeting
Friday, Oct. 16th
9:00 a.m.
City of Cape Coral Council Chambers
1015 Cultural Park Blvd.
Cape Coral
Agenda package


Background

The Lee MPO is in the midst of developing the countywide 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), which sets the direction for the County's transportation future and dictates how transportation funds are spent in the region. Given the shrinking revenues from all sources and the growing population, it is imperative that these are smart investments, getting the most bang for the buck for the county's highest priorities, consistent with the Board's goal of a balanced multi-modal transportation system.

For the uninitiated, MPOs are largely creatures of federal law and were created to coordinate the various elements of the fragmented regional transportation networks into one cohesive regional transportation system. One of the core functions laid out by the federal legislation is to prepare and maintain a long-range transportation plan. MPOs must develop a 20-year LRTP that "supports improved mobility and access for people and goods (including operations and maintenance) and supports a good quality of life." The plan includes a list of priority investments, anticipated available funding, and the regional goals and policies that will be pursued during that 20-year period. It must be formally adopted by the MPO and updated at least every 5 years. The 2040 LRTP must be adopted by the Lee MPO Board by December 18, 2015.

One of the goals of the federal law is to ensure that the public, especially those traditionally underserved by the transportation system, have opportunities to participate in the decision-making process, so there is increasing emphasis on improving public involvement in the development of the LRTP.

Key Topics for Discussion at the Oct. 16th MPO Board Meeting (in agenda item order)

FDOT 5-year WorkPlan--Agenda Item #6
Agenda Item #6 is review of the FDOT workplan see FDOT document.

See BWL's 10/8 blog post with analysis on the FDOT plan (with attention to bike/ped projects), including MPO tables analyzing the workplan vs. the MPO Board's request.

LRTP Projects and impact fees discussion--Agenda Item #12
See agenda item #12 for the draft list of transportation projects proposed to inclusion in the funding plan. This includes roads, bridges, transit, freight, bike/ped projects, and congestion management projects.

The CAC's recommendation on impact fees was covered in a News-Press 10/8 article.
Link to Impact Fee Revenues Report and Analysis--Oct. 2015 (actuals for 30 months, through end of Sept. 2015)

Other Bike/Ped agenda items: Agenda Items 9 and 13
There are also two bike/ped related items on the agenda:

Agenda item #9: Cape Coral bike/ped master plan. The Board will take action on the selection committee's recommended consultant, and then the long-awaited effort of developing a bike/ped master plan for Cape Coral can get underway.

Agenda item #13 is a proposed MPO letter of support for Rep. Passidomo's bicycle safety bill, similar to the letter they sent to the Lee Legislative delegation on last year's version of the bill. [See BikeWalkLee's 10/1/15 statement to Lee Legislative delegation on bill.]

Opportunity for Public Comment
If you plan to attend, there is an opportunity for public comment at the time each agenda item is considered. [Just fill out speaker card on table at the front of the room and hand to Chairman prior to meeting.] Alternatively, you can contact Lee MPO Board Members with your comments. Note that every municipality and the BoCC has representation on the MPO Board.

Next Steps

While the MPO Board will vote on the draft transportation projects list at the Oct. 16th meeting, this is a preliminary vote. There will be a public hearing on the proposed cost feasible plan at the Nov. 20th MPO Board meeting, and the Board will take final action to adopt the LRTP 2040 Plan at its Dec. 18th meeting.

Recent BWL-related blogs and other articles:

1. Oct. 8, 2015: FDOT proposes 5-year funding plan for Lee County and provides opportunity for public comment

2. August 12, 2015: Invite to August 25th Public Workshop on Lee County 2040 Transportation Plan

3. May 4, 2015: Time to participate in development of Lee County's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)

4. April 17, 2015:Lee MPO Board reviews framework for 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan decisions

5. LRTP Resource Document: BikeWalkLee put together a resource document for the 2040 LRTP Process (with lots of links) based on our many related blog posts. (5/13/15)

6.  Oct. 10, 2015: Naples Daily News article: Corkscrew improvements not likely for awhile.

7.  News-Press Oct. 13, 2015: Bonita, Estero push for fees rapped

8.  Naples Daily News Oct. 14, 2015 Editorial:  With construction booming again, do roads fit into the equation?



Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Local road impact fees can now be used for bike/ped and transit infrastructure projects

Although it hasn't been picked up in the media, over the past six months both the Lee Board of County Commissioners and the Bonita Springs City Council have updated their road impact fee regulations to allow road impact fees to be used for bike/ped and transit infrastructure projects. 

BikeWalkLee supports the actions by Bonita and BoCC to begin to move the road impact fees into a more multi-modal transportation approach.  The next step needed is to move to mobility fees, which not only takes a multi-modal approach in the use of the funds, but also provides a growth management tool to promote infill and redevelopment and curtail sprawl. 

Background
On July 15th, the Bonita Springs City Council adopted an ordinance (Ordinance No. 15-16), which amends the definition in the road impact fee ordinance to include alternative roadway capacity improvements, similar to action taken by Lee County BoCC in March.  The Bonita Springs ordinance further states that the Council will take further action as it moves forward with implementation of its complete streets policies as part of its upcoming EAR process.

This trend in providing more flexibility in use of road impact fees for other transportation modes is not unique to Lee County.  Just last week, the Tampa City Council took action on the same issue.  

 In the past, road impact fees could only be used to build roads to meet the transportation needs of the new developments and businesses.  Since road impact fees were put in place throughout Florida in the late 1980s and 1990s, there has been a major shift at the national, state, and local level to a multi-modal transportation system, not just cars, to get people to where they want to go.  Thus,  the road-only use of those funds is inconsistent with this approach.

In the Lee County Comp Plan amendments (called Horizon 2035) developed by staff and approved by all the relevant committees (with extensive public input and involvement) over the period of 2010-2014, the Plan as recommended to BoCC included incorporating a multi-modal transportation approach, and moving away from road-only transportation approaches, such as auto-only Level of Service (LOS) and road impact fees.  The draft Comp Plan amendments envisioned a mobility plan and mobility fee approach as a replacement for road impact fees.  [Note: this BoCC has taken no action on the Horizon 2035 Plan and has given no indication that they plan to consider it.]

As part of the County's deliberations on impact fees, in January,  Duncan and Associates updated the impact fees to reflect current costs, as required by State law.  Their January report on road impact fees had a section on multi-modal improvements (p. 16-13), which reviewed  the County Commission's discussions about transitioning to a mobility fee and recommended that the ordinance be amended to provide flexibility to spend road impact fees on improvements such as sidewalks, bikeways, trails and bus pull-out lanes that are not part of a road widening project.   Thus, road impact fees may be used to fund additional improvements as long as they expand the capacity of the roadway.  Like the current impact fee system, the projects funded must be in the impact fee district within which the fees were collected.   
 
2015 Duncan Report: Update of Road Impact Fees
 Including this new definition resulted in a lowering of the County's net road impact fee.  That's because including stand-alone bike/ped improvements meant that the revenue credits increased, i.e., you can reduce costs by taking some of the trips off the road and instead putting them on biking/walking/transit facilities; thereby lowering the net road impact fee.  
 
As we pointed out to the BoCC in our public comments on March 3rd, there are several  recent developments that could have benefited from this flexibility language--Fiddlesticks Blvd, Palomino Rd, and Estero Parkway.  Instead of taking some of the trips off the road with needed walking and biking facilities at the time the housing developments were built, the Fiddlesticks community, for example, has had to wait 10 plus years at 10 times the cost to provide these needed transportation facilities, and communities along Palomino Rd. and Estero Parkway probably have another 5-10 year wait.  It's a win-win for everyone to have this flexibility language.

Click here for BikeWalkLee's Jan. 29, 2015 letter to BoCC stating our support for this provision.

Click here for the Lee County March 3, 2015 ordinance (Ordinance 15-03) with new flexibility language.

Click here for the Jan. 2015 Duncan report on impact fees.

BikeWalkLee will be tracking the implementation of this new flexibility language and will report on the use of this language to provide bike/ped/transit infrastructure on transportation projects necessitated by growth.  We also encourage the County and Bonita Springs (and other local jurisdictions) to consider taking the next step--replacing road impact fees with a mobility fee system.

Report by Darla Letourneau



Saturday, May 30, 2015

BikeWalkLee comments to BoCC on its "growth increment funding" budget proposal

The FY 2015-16 budget process has begun in Lee County. At the Board of County Commissioners' meeting on June 2nd, they will consider a proposal to set aside some of next year's general fund budget for transportation. BikeWalkLee shared its views on this proposal in a May 29th letter (see below).
 
FY 2015-16 Budget Process
The next important date is June 16th, when the Board will hold a workshop (no public comment allowed) to discuss the draft FY 2015-16 budget.  This document should be made available to the public prior to the 6/16 workshop. The Board will set the millage rate on August 4th, and then hold a second budget workshop (again no public comment allowed) on the final draft budget on August 18th.  The two formal public hearings on the budget (required by state law) will be held on Sept. 9th and Sept. 23rd.  Prior to that, the only opportunity for public comment on the draft budget will be at the regular BoCC meetings on Aug. 4th and 18th (at the end of those meetings under either "Public Presentation of Matters by Citizens" or "Public Comment on Work Session" agenda items).  The public can always communicate its views to Board members in letters, phone calls, and meetings throughout the process.

BoCC members:
 John Manning: dist1@leegov.com, 533-2224
Cecil Pendergrass: dist2@leegov.com, 533-2227
Larry Kiker: dist3@leegov.com, 533-2223
Brian Hamman: dist4@leegov.com, 533-2226
Frank Mann: dist5@leegov.com, 533-2225


May 29, 2015
Dear Commissioners:

BikeWalkLee, a coalition working to complete Lee County's streets, works for a balanced multi-modal transportation system that values transportation choice, connectivity, economic opportunity, livable communities, community character, safety, and quality growth.  
On June 2, you will be considering staff's "growth increment funding" proposal, and BikeWalkLee would like to communicate its views in advance of your deliberations.  Those views are:
  •  If the Board plans to use some of next year's general fund budget for transportation, a significant portion of these funds should be dedicated to bike/ped retrofit projects and transit funding. 
  • All road projects in the CIP should be designed with a complete streets approach in an effort to improve the safety for all road users. 
  • Finally, we recommend that you act now to restore impact fees to the 100% rate. 
The Board is being asked to provide policy direction for development of this year's draft continuation budget.  The staff's "growth increment funding" proposal is simply a methodology for arriving at a dollar amount to earmark in the budget process from general fund (which comes from property taxes) for infrastructure projects.  In reality, this proposal is simply filling the hole created by the loss of impact fee revenues.  The proposal shows $7.9 million being earmarked for that purpose next year--filling the estimated $7 million/year hole created by your 55% reduction in road and park impact fees collection rates.

As we stated throughout the impact fee debate, we supported the county's 25-year policy that growth should pay for growth and warned that if developers were not charged the full cost of the infrastructure necessitated by that development, the taxpayers would be picking up the tab.  Your proposal makes that scenario a reality-- the shortfall in impact fee revenues would now be paid for with property taxes.

BikeWalkLee agrees that additional funds are needed to implement multi-modal transportation projects and retrofit dangerous conditions for users. We also believe that, in some instances, the general fund is appropriate for these purposes.  For example, a $2 million/year allocation would allow the Board to fully fund the recent BPAC request for stand-alone bike/ped retrofit projects to attack the extensive backlog of 85 approved and prioritized projects (totaling $68 million).  Lee County ranks as one of the most dangerous areas in the country for pedestrians and cyclists and it's important that our elected officials take actions to make our roads safer. 

For the past four years, we have been highlighting the new fiscal realities in the transportation world--the transportation funding of the past has been reduced at all level of government and isn't coming back.  Given this new reality, local governments must figure out how to maximize their local revenues for transportation and best invest these dollars to maximize the benefits.

Unfortunately, during the impact fee debates over the past two years, the Board ignored this fiscal reality and drastically cut impact fees. Impact fees are one of the three main sources for transportation funding in Lee County--the other two (almost equal) sources are tolls and gas taxes.  When we pointed out that the out-year costs of the Board's approved 5-year transportation CIP was significantly underfunded, the response was that "the CIP is balanced" so these road impact fee dollars were not needed.  It's regrettable that the truth about the transportation funding needs was not part of the impact fee debate so that the consequences of forgoing these revenues could have been considered before the decision was made to continue a significant reduction in collection of the full costs of public infrastructure investments necessitated by new development.  For road impact fees alone, the 5-year loss due to the Board's policy decisions is an estimated $33 million.

The "growth increment funding" proposal does nothing to address the larger transportation funding deficit, which staff estimates to be $400 million.  The only reasonable next step to address this shortfall would be to restore the impact fees to the 100% collection rate.  While these two steps (the incremental growth proposal and restoring impact fees to 100%) will clearly not fully fund the transportation deficit, it would put the county on a path to a longer term solution. The reality is there are no additional federal or state funds that are going to come bail us out, as Commissioner Kiker suggested at the March 19th BoCC workshop.  The federal Highway Trust Fund is broken and Congress has clearly demonstrated it is not capable of addressing our nation's infrastructure funding crisis.  Likewise, Gov. Scott has made it clear that he's not planning to raise revenues to deal with the state's transportation funding needs, as some other states have done.  So, that leaves it up to each community to find ways to address this problem-- by astutely maintaining available local revenues and by spending those revenues as smartly and cost-effectively as possible.  The only fiscally responsible approach is to equitably maximize the revenue sources available to the county.

A missing piece in this discussion is the other important part of the transportation system--transit. To increase the economic competitiveness of Lee County, reduce overall transportation costs, and increase our quality of life, we need a healthy transit system.  Research shows that you can't build your way out of congestion, i.e. more road lanes brings induced demand, putting more cars on the road.  A multi-modal system is the only viable option to save money in infrastructure costs and manage congestion in a crowded future. 

As the Board considers spending some general funds for infrastructure needs, it should also be increasing general fund expenditures for LeeTran operations.  The county should be proactively preparing to meet the future demand of a population projected to grow to over 1 million by 2040. LeeTran services were cut back in 2013-14 and, while funds were restored in last year's budget, damage was done to the system's viability. As a result of these cutbacks, transit became a less reliable means of travel to work or other essential destinations.  Investments in public transportation are the fiscally responsible way to meet the transportation needs of a growing area such as Lee County.

In summary, if the Board plans to use some of next year's general fund budget for transportation, a significant portion of these funds should be dedicated to bike/ped retrofit projects and transit funding.  Further, all road projects in the CIP should be designed with a complete streets approach in an effort to improve the safety for all road users.  Finally, we recommend that you act now to restore impact fees to the 100% rate. 

Thank you for considering our views.

Sincerely,
 
Darla Letourneau
on behalf of BikeWalkLee
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Recent Letters to BoCC on topic:



Jan. 29, 2015: BikeWalkLee letter to BoCC opposing extension of impact fee reductions


Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Action Alert: Public hearing and final vote on March 3rd re: BoCC proposal to extend impact fee reductions

On Tuesday, March 3rd the Lee County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on their proposal to extend the impact fee reductions (with proposal to only collect 45% of the full cost) for THREE more years.  At the end of the meeting they will vote on the proposal. Much is at stake for advocates of complete streets and county taxpayers in this decision, so plan to share your views with commissioners at the March 3rd meeting or before. Click here for BikeWalkLee's Jan. 29th letter to Commissioners urging them to vote to return impact fees to the full 100% rate, as modified by the Duncan Report updates.


For additional statements about what's at stake in this decision read:

 What do I need to do?
1. Write a Letter to the Editor of the News Press expressing your support for ending impact fee reductions.

  2,  Before Tuesday, March 3rd call, email and/or write the Commissioners to urge them to end impact fee reductions.  Under the current ordinance the reductions automatically expire March 13th.

3. Speak at the March 3rd County Commission public hearing before final vote on the impact fee rates. (9:30 a.m. in County Commission Chambers)


Opportunities for Communicating with Individual Commissioners: (Write a letter, an email or call County Commissioners)

o John Manning: dist1@leegov.com, 533-2224
o Cecil Pendergrass: dist2@leegov.com, 533-2227
o Larry Kiker: dist3@leegov.com, 533-2223
o Brian Hamman: dist4@leegov.com, 533-2226
o Frank Mann: dist5@leegov.com, 533-2225 [NOTE: only commissioner who voted against the impact fee reductions.]

Letters to the editor:
News-Press:
· submit online: http://www.news-press.com/section/editor_letter
· submit by email: mailbag@news-press.com
· or any local/community paper that publishes letters to the editor

Background Links:




Dear Commissioners:            

BikeWalkLee, a coalition working to complete Lee County's streets, works for a more balanced transportation system.   At the Feb. 3rd Board meeting you will be considering whether to reestablish the 100% impact fee program, as modified by the recommendations of the Duncan Report. BikeWalkLee  urges you to take no action to extend reduced impact fees, so that the previous impact rates automatically are reinstated effective March 13, 2015, as called for in your March 2013 ordinance.  We further urge you to adopt the recommendations in the just released Duncan Associates Road Impact Fee Study and School Impact Fee Study, updating the 100% rates reflecting current costs.

We commend the Board for its wisdom in ordering verification of actual current costs via the Duncan Report updates.  And, now armed with this information, there are no policy reasons to not follow the report’s recommendations and fully fund the necessary infrastructure.


BikeWalkLee has steadfastly opposed the suspension or reduction in impact fees over the past four years, opposed the Board's 80% reduction in impact fees in March 2013, urged the Board to end the reduction in Feb. 2014, and now urges the Board to reestablish the 100% impact fee program, as modified by the required updated fee schedules recommended in the "Duncan Reports". 
As Commissioner Mann has often stated, "there is no free lunch."  The decision before you is about equity-- who pays for the infrastructure and services.  The County's policy framework is that it is shared responsibility--developers (impact fees), taxpayers (property taxes), sales taxes (residents and visitors), and bed taxes (visitors). New developments create infrastructure and service costs for governments.  The question is who should pay these costs: Those who created the costs and will benefit from the services; or the existing taxpayers through increased property taxes?  Fairness dictates that the costs be borne by those benefiting.  And, good economic sense dictates that  development-driven expansion of our public infrastructure --roads, schools, parks—be fully funded.   

Otherwise, we will usher in long-term consequences of a declining reputation and  the inability to attract and retain residents and businesses, who,  in an increasingly competitive world, are looking at quality of life features.

Road impact fees are a significant source of revenues for transportation infrastructure projects, including  bike/ped improvements, both as part of roadway projects and as stand-alone retrofit projects.  Any reduction in road impact fees has an adverse effect on funds available for these improvements.  According to LeeDOT's 1/16/15 report to Commissioner Mann detailing the list of completed transportation projects funded with road impact fees from 2000 to present, 38% of bike/ped facilities during this period were funded with impact fees.
There are currently $58 million worth of bike/ped stand-alone projects that have been approved and prioritized by the County's Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), waiting to be funded.  Since historically at least 35% of all of Lee County’s transportation infrastructure dollars have come from road impact fee revenues, any reduction in that vital revenue source means funding for bike/ped projects will be further jeopardized. 
BikeWalkLee is pleased that in the new draft ordinance staff has  included language broadening the definition of what road impact fee funds can be used for.  This language provides the county with more flexibility to use road impact fees for bike/ped improvements and bus pull out lane improvements that accommodate vehicle trips by providing alternative travel modes.  This language change begins to move the road impact fee into a more multi-modal transportation approach, as BikeWalkLee has long advocated.
Economic prosperity comes from quality investments in community infrastructure.  We urge you to vote to return impact fees to the full 100% rate, as modified by the Duncan Report updates.
Sincerely,

Darla Letourneau
On behalf of BikeWalkLee




Thursday, January 29, 2015

Action Alert: BoCC votes Feb. 3rd on proposal to extend impact fee reductions


On Tuesday, February 3rd the Lee County Commissioners will be casting a critical vote setting the future direction of the County’s Impact Fee Program. Much is at stake for advocates of complete streets and county taxpayers in this decision, so plan to share your views with commissioners at the Feb. 3rd meeting or before. There will be an opportunity for public comment beginning at 9:30 a.m. in the County Commission Chambers. There will also be a public hearing on this proposal on March 3rd prior to final Board action, so there will be a second opportunity to participate.  Click here for BikeWalkLee's Jan. 29th letter to Commissioners urging them to vote to return impact fees to the full 100% rate, as modified by the Duncan Report updates.

Why do impact fees matter?
Lee County’s Impact Fee Program was established in 1990 to provide the revenue needed to pay the capital costs imposed on a community by the thousands of new residents locating in Lee County each year and the new businesses that are necessary to satisfy their needs. The concept behind the plan then as now is that ...Growth Should Pay for Growth. They are basically user fees, and the road impact fees are very similar to gas taxes. They are used exclusively to pay transportation costs to satisfy the cost of new infrastructure within the larger district area of the new homes or businesses.

What do Lee County’s Impact Fees Pay for?
· Our New Schools
· Our New or upgraded roadways, including bike and pedestrian facilities
· Our Community and Regional Parks
· Our EMS and Fire Services

What's at stake for bike/ped world?
· Road impact fees are a significant source of funds for bike/ped improvements, both as part of roadway projects and as stand-alone bike/ped projects, and any reduction in impact fees has an adverse impact on funds available for these improvements.

· According to LeeDOT's 1/16/15 report to Commissioner Mann detailing the list of completed transportation projects funded with road impact fees from 2000 to present, 38% of bike/ped facilities during this period were funded with impact fees.

· Funding for the County's #1 priority, the Estero Blvd. Improvement project, a major roadway upgrade featuring bike/ped /transit improvements, could be jeopardized or further delayed due to the shortfall in transportation dollars, that will be further exacerbated if impact fees are not fully restored.

· For stand-alone, retrofit bike/ped projects, the County's funding formula directs 5% of impact fee revenues to these BPAC list projects. The past two years of 80% impact fee reduction has resulted in a loss of $800 K for BPAC projects--a loss of almost 50% of the overall funding formula for retrofit projects. Currently, BAPC has $58 M worth of bike/ped prioritized projects waiting to be funded, and at the current rate of spending [an average of $1 M/year over past 10 years], it will take 50 more years to implement the approved plan.

· The loss of road impact fees also directly affects the Palomino Rd. shared use path project. In April, 2014, the BoCC approved a cooperative financing arrangement whereby road impact fees paid to the City of Fort Myers by the residents in communities along Palomino Lane will be set aside for this project. If the impact fees return to 100% level, $500 K will be available from impact fees to go towards this $1.9 M project. Without full impact fee rates, it will be decades before funds are sufficient to construct this needed and approved project.

BikeWalkLee's Position 

(Click here to read BikeWalkLee's Jan. 29th letter to Commissioners)
· BikeWalkLee has steadfastly opposed the suspension or reduction in impact fees over the past five years, opposed the Board's 80% reduction in impact fees in March 2013, urged the County Commissioners to end the reduction in Feb. 2014, and now urges the Board to reestablish the 100% impact fee program, as modified by the recommendations of the "Duncan Report".

· The Road Impact Fee Update Report (aka "Duncan Report") was released on 1/27/15 and sets the new 100% rate, which is a 4% reduction from the previous 100% rate.

· BikeWalkLee urges the Board to accept the Duncan reports (road and school impact fee update studies) and to set a public hearing for March 3rd to adopt the ordinance related to putting into effect the new impact fee schedules in the Duncan reports.

· BikeWalkLee is pleased that this draft ordinance includes language broadening the definition of what road impact fee funds can be used for, providing more flexibility to use funds for bike/ped improvements and bus pull out lane improvements that accommodate vehicle trips by providing alternative travel modes. This language change begins to move the road impact fee into a more multi-modal transportation approach, as BikeWalkLee has long advocated.

· BikeWalkLee urges the Board to take NO ACTION on the proposal to set a public hearing to adopt an ordinance that would reduce the impact fee rates below the new 100% rates, as established by the Duncan reports. The full cost of the impacts caused by the developments (i.e. the 100% rate) should be collected.

 BikeWalkLee's position is based on the following beliefs:
  • Growth should pay for growth  
  • Infrastructure costs should be a shared responsibility--residents, visitors, and developers
  • Quality of life is key to Lee County's future and economic success, and requires smart investments 
  • Loss of revenues for needed transportation infrastructure jeopardizes the goal of a safe and balanced multi-modal transportation system; and 
  • The costs of unmet infrastructure needs will invariably shift to Lee Co taxpayers .
What do I need to do?

1. Before Tuesday, February 3rd call, email and/or write the Commissioners to tell them you want the Impact Fees returned to the 100% level on March 13th, when the reduction is set to expire.

2. Write a Letter to the Editor of the News Press expressing your support of the 100% Impact Fee Program.

3. Speak at the Feb. 3rd (9:30 a.m.) County Commission meeting in support of the 100% Impact Fee rate.

4. Speak at the March 3rd (9:30 a.m.) County Commission public hearing before final vote on the impact fee rates.

Opportunities for Communicating with Individual Commissioners: (Write a letter, an email or call County Commissioners)

o John Manning: dist1@leegov.com, 533-2224
o Cecil Pendergrass: dist2@leegov.com, 533-2227
o Larry Kiker: dist3@leegov.com, 533-2223
o Brian Hamman: dist4@leegov.com, 533-2226
o Frank Mann: dist5@leegov.com, 533-2225 [NOTE: only commissioner who voted against the impact fee reductions.]

Letters to the editor:
News-Press:
· submit online: http://www.news-press.com/section/editor_letter
· submit by email: mailbag@news-press.com
· or any local/community paper that publishes letters to the editor

Background Links: