Showing posts with label BWL comments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BWL comments. Show all posts

Thursday, June 13, 2019

BikeWalkLee urges BoCC to reject Lee Plan Amendments re: Mining on June 19th

On June 19th, the Lee County Commissioners will take a final vote on amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan (Lee Plan) that will eliminate the current controls on lime rock mining in Lee County.  This proposal threatens our water supply, water quality, and quality of life.  On April 14th, BikeWalkLee sent a letter to Commissioners asking them to reject these proposed amendments because of the lasting harm that will be done to our quality of life (already seriously eroded) and the County's primary tool for enhancing livability--the Lee Plan, two of BWL's overarching goals.  

At the April 17th Transmittal Hearing, the  Commission chambers were packed with interested citizens, with more than 70 individuals speaking against the proposal, including many local elected officials from around the County. In spite of the overwhelming public opposition to this proposal, the Board voted 3 to 1 to proceed (only Mann voted against).


Lee County is at a critical crossroads and much is at stake in the Board's June 19th final decision.  If you care about Lee County's future, attend Wednesday June 19th (9:30 a.m. in Commission Chambers) County Commission Final Hearing on the proposed Comp Plan amendments on mining.  In advance of this hearing, on June 13th, BikeWalkLee sent another letter to the County Commissioners urging them to vote no.

June 13, 2019

Dear Commissioners:

On June 19th you will be deciding whether to adopt Lee Plan amendments that eliminate the current controls on lime rock mining in Lee County, allowing expansion of mining--the most destructive (and non-reversible) land use. This is one of the most consequential decisions this Board will make about Lee County’s future; it will impact our water supply, water quality, and quality of life for current and future generations. BikeWalkLee urges you to listen to the many voices countywide in strong opposition to this proposal and reject these amendments.

BikeWalkLee focuses on ways to improve and support our county’s quality of life through better safety, health, and mobility. We strongly oppose these amendments because they are incompatible with the quality of life that citizens of this county expect and deserve. The amendments also dismantle the most important governmental tool for protecting and enhancing our livability—the Lee Plan. Livable communities don’t happen by accident. They are the result of good long range planning, community engagement in the Lee Plan’s development, and the commitment and political will to follow the Plan.

The mining amendments are symptomatic of this Board’s abandonment of good ideas and sound planning practices to accommodate the demands of a few rather than the needs of many. The choice before you on June 19th is clear—either you stand with the citizens of Lee County or you stand with the special interests.

We urge you to oppose these unwise and unnecessary amendments to the Lee Plan.

Sincerely,

Darla Letourneau
On behalf of BikeWalkLee
 

Sunday, April 14, 2019

BikeWalkLee urges County Commissioners to reject proposals to eliminate controls over mining on April 17th

On April 17th, the Lee County Commissioners will decide whether to adopt amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan (Lee Plan) that will eliminate the current controls on lime rock mining in Lee County.  This proposal threatens our water supply, water quality, and quality of life.  On April 14th, BikeWalkLee sent a letter to Commissioners asking them to reject these proposed amendments because of the lasting harm that will be done to our quality of life (already seriously eroded) and the County's primary tool for enhancing livability--the Lee Plan, two of BWL's overarching goals. 

Lee County is at a critical crossroads and much is at stake in the Board's April 17th decision.  If you care about Lee County's future, attend Wednesday April 17th (9:30 a.m. in Commission Chambers) County Commission Hearing on the proposed Comp Plan amendments to deregulate lime rock mining.  Last week's Action Alert will provide you with background information.

April 14, 2019

 Dear Commissioners:

On April 17 you will be asked to decide whether to adopt Lee Plan amendments that eliminate the current controls on lime rock mining in Lee County, allowing expansion of mining--the most destructive (and non-reversible) land use. This is one of the most consequential decisions this Board will make about Lee County’s future; it will impact our water supply, water quality, and quality of life for current and future generations. BikeWalkLee urges you to listen to the many voices countywide in strong opposition to this proposal and reject these proposed amendments.

BikeWalkLee focuses on ways to improve and support our county’s quality of life through better safety, health, and mobility. One of the most important governmental tools for enhancing livability is integrated planning, which is embodied in the county’s Comprehensive Plan. Our comments below focus on both the quality of life and integrated planning consequences of this proposal.



County Commissioners who will make decision on April 17th
Quality of Life
The county’s current path of rampant and unfettered development is unsustainable and incompatible with the quality of life that has drawn so many to make Lee County their home. If approved, this Lee Plan amendment opens the flood gates to expand mining throughout Southeast Lee County, directly impacting the quality of life of thousands of residents in Estero and Bonita Springs every day the mines are in operation—from cracks in homes due to mining explosions, to the never ending parade of trucks on local roadways creating noise, health, safety, and traffic issues. 

Communities outside the Density Reduction/Groundwater Resource (DR/GR) Area which have mineable limerock could also be at risk of having mines being permitted in their backyards, with similar consequences for residents. In addition, the quality and quantity of our water resources are threatened countywide, and the water quality of vital estuaries is further impaired. The impacts from mining directly or indirectly affect all citizens in the county.
 
 Opening the county up to expanded mining may very well be the last straw for many residents whose quality of life has dramatically deteriorated over the past five years --whether it’s caused by congested roads and crowded schools, lack of safe walking and biking, lack of adequate services for the growing population, or stormwater and flooding problems caused by poorly planned growth. Then there are the toxic algae blooms and fish kills that are creating health hazards, destroying marine life and ruining our beaches and coastal waters -- the drivers of our tourism economy. This not only affects current residents and visitors, it affects the county’s ability to attract and retain workers and families, which are vital to the short-term and long-term economic viability of Lee County. Unfortunately, a community’s reputation for a good quality of life can change overnight-- and once that happens, it can take years of work to repair. We can’t wait until our quality of life is gone to protect it, because it will be too late.

 Improving and maintaining quality of life is an economic necessity, both to grow a diverse economy as well as to maintain a tourist-based one. The role of our elected leaders is to improve the livability of Lee County so we can attract the businesses and skilled workers needed to grow. Good economics and good quality of life feed each other. The decision you make on April 17 will not only affect the current residents, it will affect future generations.

 
As the 16-year old Swedish climate activist told a United Nations gathering in December 2018: “You say you love your children above all else, and yet you’re stealing their future in front of their very eyes.”

Integrated Planning
One of BikeWalkLee’s top priorities over the past 10 years has been to promote integrated planning by local, regional, and state agencies and elected officials. Our vision is that innovative and integrated land use and transportation planning can enhance our county’s livability. At the same time, this vision encourages creative new development and development in ways that meet the infrastructure needs, need for green spaces, and to locate the growth where infrastructure already exists, while preserving and enhancing the quality of life. In support of this vision, we have been deeply involved in the many county and Metropolitan Planning Organization planning efforts related to land use and transportation.

 The Lee Plan is the county’s overarching planning policy document, serving as a “road map” for the public to know how the county will address a wide variety of issues including land use, transportation, housing, natural and cultural resources protection, economic development, etc. It is the policy foundation from which all other county policies, ordinances, codes, guidelines, and practices flow. It is designed to be a comprehensive, holistic and internally consistent plan that enables the county to implement its stated vision. The state even requires this plan to be updated every seven years to address new challenges and new opportunities the county faces and to fine-tune the framework to better implement the county’s vision – a crucial component of reasonable, consistent planning.

 But the county’s planning efforts are no longer reasonable or consistent. This Lee Plan amendment proposal is just the latest and most alarming yet of the many “small” amendments this Board has approved. Collectively, these amendments are unraveling the very policy foundation of county government. Almost every time a proposed development or zoning request conflicts with something in the Lee Plan, the Plan is amended to accommodate that specific project – the exact opposite of comprehensive planning. The cumulative effect is that the Lee Plan, which hasn’t had a major rewrite in almost 30 years, no longer tells the citizens of this county where we’re headed. It’s doubly tragic because in 2010-2013 the community collaborated with county government to produce a comprehensive revision of the Lee Plan. After years of effort, an award-winning Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) in 2011, and the completion of the Horizon 2035 Plan that represented a consensus of the various groups and committees, this Board never even looked at the Plan and never gave its committees or the public an opportunity to discuss the proposal with the Board. 

 
The proposed mining amendment is symptomatic of this trend to abandon good ideas and sound planning practices to accommodate the demands of a few rather than the needs of the many. There is a sound and reasonable policy in place today to allow the destructive (but necessary) practice of limerock mining to continue in the DR/GR Area in a way that balances the need for construction materials against the long-held purpose of the DR/GR designation – to encourage groundwater recharge and preserve long-term low-density land uses in the southeast portion of the county. Mining and subsequent restoration could continue as needed and new mines could be allowed once the need for more material was evident (and the damage from old mines was mitigated). That approach balances private rights with public needs and environmental protection.

To abandon this sound planning approach without justification, without assessing the potential damages and without meaningful public input makes a sham of the comprehensive land use planning process as it threatens water quality and aquifer recharge. It also jeopardizes the certainty for other areas of the county to know that their long-term planning protections will actually remain in place should they ever conflict with a developer’s desires to maximize their profits at the expense of the community’s quality of life.

Lee County is at a crossroads. The water quality crisis we experienced in 2018 is still out there, posing an imminent threat to the county’s present and future viability. The pressures of growth on our community continue to expand, while the funding needed to pay for that growth is constricted and inadequate. And the reputation of Lee County as good place to live, work and play continues to erode with every new crisis, every dramatic downturn and every environmental catastrophe. The very future of Lee County hangs in the balance—our ecology, our economy, our quality of life. County leaders should be doing everything in their power to better protect our water quality. Instead, this proposed amendment will make our water quality problem even worse, which is simply unconscionable.

As the Feb. 15th News-Press editorial opposing this proposed amendment stated: “The county needs to protect the environment, not expand mining. This should be a no-brainer for the county commission.”

We hope that you will oppose this unwise and unnecessary amendment to the Lee Plan.

 

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

News-Press: Nationwide dangerous roads study again places Florida first; Cape Coral, Fort Myers drops


Fort Myers New-Press, Jan. 23, 2019

Despite the reality of two pedestrian deaths in Lee County in the past eight days, a new study shows the Cape Coral-Fort Myers metropolitan area is no longer the deadliest spot for people traveling on foot or bike in Florida.

However, Florida once again is the deadliest state for pedestrians, according to the national 2019 Dangerous By Design study.

The Florida Highway Patrol said Alana Marie Tamplin, 12, was walking south on the edge of Durrance Road near Deal Road when she was hit by this vehicle Monday. (Photo: Special to The News-Press/FHP)

The Cape Coral-Fort Myers area's decline in standing does not necessarily mean the area is safer, said Emiko Atherton, executive director of the National Complete Streets Coalition.

"We don't look at actual causation," she said of the study, adding that it wasn't likely a case of Lee County getting better. "Our best guess is that some other places in Florida got worse."

The two most recent pedestrian deaths in Lee County could give pause to that assessment.

On the morning of Jan. 14, 12-year-old Alana Tamplin was hit and killed as she walked along Durrance Street near her North Fort Myers home. A few days later Pauline Griffiths, 70, of Ontario, Canada, was trying to cross the northbound lanes of 41 in North Fort Myers and was hit and killed by a motorcycle. The motorcyclist also died in the crash.
The mother of Alana, Sarah Tamplin, said another crash happened on Durrance in the past few days.

 "Someone hit a rider and his horse on our street. So my comment is that clearly dark or daylight doesn't make a difference," she said. "If you are behind the wheel, you need to pay attention. Get rid of the distractions because your single moment of inattention can cost someone their lives and no one deserves to lose a loved one in such a senseless tragedy."

The study, released Jan. 22 by the National Complete Streets Coalition, ranked 100 major metropolitan areas across the U.S. that are the worst for pedestrian safety based on population, pedestrian commuters and fatalities and based on statistics gathered from 2007 to 2018.

The coalition is made up of Smart Growth America, AARP and other organizations.

The study showed drivers hit and killed 49,340 pedestrians nationwide from 2007-18.

Joining Florida at the top of the list again was Alabama. The rest of the top 10 states — Delaware, Louisiana, Mississippi, Georgia, New Mexico, Texas, Arizona and South Carolina — stayed the same but many switched positions.

In Florida in the 2007-18 period there have been 5,433 pedestrian deaths. California had more deaths in that time frame but, with a larger population, that state had a lower pedestrian fatalities per 100,000 population percentage.

"I'm not surprised that Lee County retains a position among the worse 10 nationwide," said Dan Moser, BikeWalkLee steering committee member and traffic safety consultant. "From my perspective, since the release of the 2016 report, there's been little to no action to address the problems or even a sense of urgency among our elected and transportation officials or tourism, building, and real estate sector reps. Only advocates, first responders and those in the health care system have been waving red flags. Otherwise it's been road-building and development business-as-usual. I'd hope that this latest report will finally light a fire under those who can change things for the better."

Florida metropolitan areas ranked high in the nation's top 10. In order, the most dangerous areas were: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, Lakeland-Winter Haven, Jacksonville, Bakersfield, California; Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, and Jackson, Mississippi.

A previous study ranked the Cape Coral-Fort Myers metropolitan area as the deadliest in the nation for pedestrians. That report covered the 2005-14 period.

Don Scott, chair of the Metropolitan Planning Organization, said that Lee County recorded a positive in the past year with total traffic fatalities down, 93 compared to 113 in 2017.

"The negative is that pedestrian fatalities haven' changed," he said. There were 23 pedestrians deaths and four bicycle deaths in Lee County in 2018 compared to 18 and three in 2017.

Statewide, while overall traffic deaths dropped from 3,114 in 2017 to 3,004 in 2018, with pedestrian and bike deaths were up in that time. Pedestrian deaths rose from 658 to 668 and bicycle deaths went from 128 to 140.

"FHP encourages all motorists to drive sober, undistracted and with all occupants properly restrained," said Lt. Greg Bueno of the Florida Highway Patrol. "Motorists who follow all traffic laws, obey speed limits and operate in a courteous manner toward fellow drivers are always safer on the state’s highways. "

The report gave an expanded look at pedestrian safety patterns and examined how pedestrian fatalities disproportionately affected diverse communities and older people.

The report also presented data on pedestrian fatalities and injuries in every U.S. metro area included in the study, as well as state and county assessments and an online, interactive map showing the locations where pedestrian fatalities have occurred.

Among the solutions suggestion were better planning by state departments of transportation, more flexible federal guidelines for planners and engineers and higher federal funding priorities.

 Deadliest areas for pedestrians
 The report ranks the below metro areas for the top 20 highest (worst) “Pedestrian Danger Index” ratings:



1) Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL

2) Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL

3) Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL

4) North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL

5) Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL

6) Jacksonville, FL

7) Bakersfield, CA

8) Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL

9) Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL

10) Jackson, MS

11) Memphis, TN-AR

12) Baton Rouge, LA

13) Birmingham-Hoover, AL

14) Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL

15) Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC

16) McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX

17) Albuquerque, NM

18) Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI

19) Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR

20) Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC


:More


Motorcyclist, pedestrian killed in crash on US 41 in North Fort Myers on Saturday
Lee County sees decline in traffic fatalities in 2018

 Fort Myers-area traffic deaths hit triple digits for second consecutive year

BikeWalkLee: What all cyclists, pedestrians should know
 

BikeWalkLee's Statement on the 2019 Dangerous by Design Report: Assessment of Efforts in Lee County to Improve Pedestrian Safety and Future Improvements Needed

BWL issued a statement today in response to the 2019 Dangerous by Design Report.This statement looks at the extent to which Lee County jurisdictions and agencies are implementing safety improvements and where future improvements are needed by each of the jurisdictions, agencies, and stakeholders. We hope that the 2019 Report lights a fire under all those who can improve pedestrian safety. This metro area (Lee County), along with the entire state of Florida, can and must do more to reduce the number of people who die while walking every day on our roadways.


Jan. 23, 2019

Statement by BikeWalkLee to the 2019 Dangerous by Design Report: Assessment of Efforts in Lee County to Improve Pedestrian Safety and Future Improvements Needed

The just released “Dangerous by Design” 2019 report shows that our nation’s streets aren’t getting safer for pedestrians. While traffic deaths among motor vehicle occupants over this 10-year period (2008-2017) decreased by 6.1%, pedestrian deaths increased by 35.4%.  Pedestrian deaths have been steadily rising since 2009, reaching 6,000 deaths annually in 2016 and 2017. As a result, pedestrians now account for a larger proportion of traffic fatalities than they have in the past 33 years. 

Similar trends are evident in Florida and Lee County. Florida continues to be the most dangerous state in the country for pedestrians, with eight of the top 10 most dangerous metro areas in the country.  While the Cape Coral/Fort Myers metro area (Lee County) was ranked the worst in the country in the 2016 report, this year our area ranks the eighth worst in the country.  Although Lee County’s Pedestrian Danger Index (PDI) went down somewhat in real terms, our lower ranking compared to the 2016 report was primarily because other metro areas’ PDIs (all in Florida) had significant increases.

Efforts to make streets and roads safer have been underway statewide and in the various Florida metro areas, including Lee County, for almost a decade, but much work remains to be done, as under scored by this report. These results prove that desires and designs alone won’t make our streets safer – it takes the will to implement those designs and to back up those desires with the funds to make them a reality.
All Lee County jurisdictions and agencies can collectively either move forward to make our infrastructure safer for bikers and walkers, or accept higher pedestrian and cyclist death rates. More citizens are moving here.  Before long, new and old residents alike will begin to realize their quality of life is slipping because sufficient investments have not been made to make our roadways safer for everyone.  Now is the time to embrace change by funding a safer future. 
Why it matters
A chronic culture of danger for area walkers and cyclists threatens not only residents and visitors; it undercuts our economy; threatens our ability to attract and retain businesses, workers, and families to live and work here; undermines our tourism marketing; and underlines a growing safety gap driven by socioeconomic conditions and geographic patterns. 
However, investments in “Complete Streets” designs (road designs that take into account the needs and safety of ALL roadway users including cyclists and pedestrians) and bike/ped safety countermeasures not only make our streets safer for all users (including motorists), they make good economic sense.  Today, more and more people want to live and work in walkable communities, yet Lee County lags far behind in offering them. Research proves that sidewalks and shared use paths increase the value of homes in those neighborhoods. Bottom line: Investing in and maintaining walkable communities is a win/win strategy.
It is also important to understand that Complete Streets is not just about adding more sidewalks, shared use paths, and bike lanes.  It’s about making a paradigm shift—one that integrates land use and transportation planning, and changes the way we plan and design all our roads so that they’re safer for everyone, including pedestrians and cyclists. 
Proven pedestrian/bicycle safety steps
While expanding and connecting bike/ped infrastructure is an important component in making a community safer for walking and biking, many other roadway design and safety features are important for improving safety.
The most significant danger for pedestrians and cyclists is the speed of vehicles on the road, with the speed often determining whether the vulnerable road users is injured (and how seriously) or killed in any crashes with motor vehicles.  Thus, many safety countermeasures aim to reduce vehicle speed.**
The following sections of this report look at the extent to which Lee County jurisdictions and agencies are implementing safety improvements and future improvements needed. [Click here to read the rest of the BWL's Statement.]
Notes:
The “Dangerous by Design” 2019 report, released by Smart Growth America on Jan. 23, is the fifth edition of the national bi-annual pedestrian safety report which ranks states and the 100 most populous metropolitan areas around the country based on how deadly they are for people walking.* [Link to 2019 Dangerous by Design Report]

*The report uses traffic deaths for the 10-year period of 2008-2017, and looks at how deadly it is for people to walk based on the number of people struck and killed by drivers while walking, controlling for the number of residents and the number of people that walk to work.

* *The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has identified 20 proven safety countermeasures that offer significant and measurable impacts to improving roadway safety, several of which are specifically targeted to safety for pedestrians and cyclists. (Source:
FHWA: Making our Roads Safer One Countermeasure at a Time (2018)

Some of the most important FHWA proven safety measures for reducing the number of fatal and serious injury crashes for pedestrians and cyclists are roundabouts, road diets, medians and pedestrian crossing islands, leading pedestrian intervals, and pedestrian hybrid beacons. The Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) adds automated speed enforcement/red light cameras, and reducing speed limits on local roads (along with speed bumps) to this list. [
GHSA report: Speeding Away from Zero: Rethinking a Forgotten Traffic Safety Challenge, Jan. 2019.] 

Links:
2019 Dangerous by Design Report, with data on state rankings and the 100 largest metro areas rankings, along with other resources and an interactive map of 10 years of pedestrian fatalities.

 







Thursday, March 1, 2018

BikeWalkLee's Letter to County Commissioners in Support of 100% Impact Fees


 On Tuesday, March 6th, the County Commissioners will be considering whether impact fees should return to the 100% rate or continue its impact fee reduction policies, which has resulted in the loss of $83 million in revenues over the past 5 years.  BikeWalkLee strongly supports returning to the 100% impact fees and has shared our comments with Commissioners.  Make your voices heard before or at this important meeting on Tuesday. Here's the Link to this Letter.





March 1, 2018

Lee County Board of Commissioners
2120 SW Main Street
Fort Myers, FL 33901

Dear Commissioners: 
BikeWalkLee, a coalition working to complete Lee County's streets, works for a more balanced multi-modal transportation system that values transportation choice, connectivity, economic opportunity, livable communities, community character, safety, and quality growth.  Over the past six years, we have steadfastly opposed the suspension or reduction in impact fees.  We believe that providing public infrastructure should be a shared responsibility; that investments in public infrastructure necessitated by growth should be paid for by those creating that need;  and that infrastructure investments should keep pace with permitted development so that the quality of life for all residents does not erode as a result.

At your March 6 Board meeting, we urge you:

·        To take no action to extend reduced impact fees, so that the full base rate (100%) is automatically reinstated effective March 16, 2018, as called for in your March 2015 ordinance;

·        To adopt the recommendations in the 2018 Duncan Associates impact fee studies (roads, schools, parks, fire/EMS), updating the 100% rates reflecting current costs;

·        To oppose any efforts to lengthen the impact fee update cycle beyond the current long-standing practice of updating the fees on a three-year cycle. 

When the Board enacted the reduced collection rate (20% for two years) in 2013, and then extended it in 2015 (with a reduced collection rate of 45% for three years), the ordinances stated that these reductions were to provide temporary relief to the building and construction industry in recognition of the downturn in the U.S. economy. The downturn in the economy is long over, with employment and growth booming in Lee County, and it's past time for the "temporary relief" to come to an end.
This "temporary relief" has come at a high cost to the taxpayers. As a result of this Board's policy decisions (supported by all Board members with the exception of Commissioner Mann) to reduce impact fee collection rates over the past five years, $83 million in revenues has been lost (approximately half for roads as well as parks; and the other half for schools). Public infrastructure costs due to permitted development are determined by state-mandated impact fee studies which establish the base impact fees. According to these studies (e.g. Duncan Update studies), $128 million is necessary to cover the public infrastructure costs associated with these developments, yet the county collected only $45 million of that amount, creating a $83 million unfunded liability for the taxpayers of Lee County. [See Attachment 1.]
Now the Board is considering a proposal to extend this 45% collection rate for another five years, which would result in an additional estimated loss of $122 million ($24 million a year), bringing the 10-year revenue loss to over $200 million (half for schools and other half for roads and parks). [See Attachment 2.]  If this 45% collection rate becomes permanent (as the majority of the Commission clearly intends), by 2040, the County will have lost an additional $400 million in revenue...for a grand total of $600 million (half for schools and half for roads and parks)! It is fiscally irresponsible of the Board to give away a vital revenue source necessary to meet the public infrastructure needs of this growing county, even more so because no replacement revenue sources have been put in place to cover these costs. 

During the 24 years from when road impact fees were instituted (FY 1990 through FY 2013, when slashing of impact fees began), this revenue source constituted about one-third of all revenues funding transportation projects. As a result of the Board's impact fee reduction policy decisions over the past five years, that share has dropped from 36% to 10%. It is time to re-assert the community compact of shared responsibility that served the county well for the previous 24 years, and return impact fees to 100% of the base rate. [See Attachment 3.]

In addition to the detrimental impacts from the past five years' $83 million revenue loss, there has been an even more lasting casualty: In the Board's attempt to justify slashing impact fees, it has created a false narrative that there are sufficient revenues to meet the transportation needs of this growing community. Nothing could be further from the truth. 

The countywide long range transportation plan (2040 LRTP) approved in 2015 by the MPO Board (consisting of all 5 Commissioners along with elected officials from each of the 6 municipalities), clearly sounded the alarm about the growing transportation funding shortfall. Less than half of the projects in the approved list can be funded with the estimated revenues coming in through 2040. For the LRTP projects that are solely the responsibility of Lee County, there is a $1.2 billion shortfall over the next 22 years, with 55% of the need left unfunded. This is half of the $2.3 billion shortfall  in the overall Plan. Furthermore, as the MPO's LRTP made clear, the upward pressure on project costs coupled with worsening downward trends on almost all revenue sources, the transportation funding shortfall with be significantly higher when the 2045 LRTP is adopted in 2019. [See Attachment 4.]  

The County Administration has argued that it has "solved" the funding shortfall problem with its Growth Increment Fund (GIF).  This is not true.  First, no new revenues have been raised.  GIF simply shifts approximately $11 million/year in already collected property tax revenues (from all residents) to the transportation CIP every year; thereby shifting who is paying for this infrastructure.  Second and most importantly,  even with these GIF revenues, the funding shortfall has only been reduced to $864 million-- with  41% of the funding shortfall remaining.  

Restoring impact fees to 100% will make a big dent in the shortfall (closing half of the gap), but the County will still be faced with  a remaining 23% funding shortfall ($481 million).  As has been discussed by the MPO, new revenue sources are needed and it is the responsibility of local leaders to come up with solutions; yet nothing has been done. Through its actions to reduce impact fee revenue collections, this Board has made an already dire funding situation much worse. [See Attachment  5.]

The Board's exclusive focus on the Transportation CIP's five-year window is very deceptive. In order to create the impression that no additional funds are needed, it simply pushes the true costs of completing these projects into the outyears beyond the "visible" five-year window, hiding the fact that sufficient revenues are not available to complete these projects. 

Using the County's own numbers--the FY 2017-18 5-Year Transportation CIP (adopted in Sept. 2017)and its revenue estimates (provided in Feb. 6, 2018 workshop), just to complete construction of the projects already underway in the current 5-year CIP (totaling $244 million) an additional $225 million is needed, as shown the County's "6-10 year" column on its detailed CIP spreadsheet. This means that over 80% of the revenues coming in for the next 5-year window (FY 22/23-26/27) are already committed for the completion of the projects now underway.  Only $55 million will be available to spend on all the unfunded Tier II and III projects, which have a $165 million price tag.

The reality is that it will take over 15 years to fund all the projects in the current five-year CIP and on the county's approved Tier I, II, and III priorities list.  No funds will be available for any new projects until  FY 2032/33 -- 14 years from now, by which time Lee County will have another 182,000 residents on top of our current population of 700,000. [See Attachment 6.]

In addition to these "big picture" transportation funding concerns, BikeWalkLee is particularly concerned about the consequences of this funding shortfall on the growing backlog of stand-alone bike/ped retrofit projects, as well as road projects that incorporate a complete streets approach. In 2017, Lee County was ranked the deadliest metro area in the country for pedestrian safety. [The 2016 Dangerous by Design report released by Smart Growth America.] This report demonstrated the urgent need for increased investment in pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure to make Lee County roadways safer for all users. A year ago, BikeWalkLee challenged the County along with the six local municipalities, to step up their investments to make our roadways safer for everyone. Without these additional investments now, we are likely to see our "worst in the country" label stick when the next report comes out next year, hurting Lee County's reputation well beyond this one issue. Safety is essential to one's quality of life, and without it, our economic vitality cannot be sustained. 

While the County has provided some increased funding for bike/ped projects, much more needs to be done. As of January 2018, there are $105 million in bike/ped stand-alone projects that have been approved and prioritized by the County's Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee waiting to be funded. In addition, there are $38 million more in approved projects that are currently on hold until other issues are resolved.  The list of approved projects has grown from $68 million in FY 2015, essentially doubling over the past 3 years. To eliminate this backlog, and to make our existing roadways  safer for pedestrians and cyclists, significant additional revenues are needed in the transportation budget over the next 15 years and beyond. [See Attachment  7.] 
The Board needs to be honest with the citizens of Lee County about the growing transportation funding shortfall rather than pretending it doesn't exist so the Board can squander much needed revenues by only collecting a fraction of impact fees due to the county and school district. The Board's actions on this critical issue over the past five years have misled the public about the true transportation funding situation and undermined the long-standing social compact of "shared sacrifices" that is critical to the public's trust in its elected officials, making it even harder to gain public support for these efforts in the future.
Economic prosperity comes from quality investments in community infrastructure. We urge you to vote to return impact fees to the full 100% rate, as updated by the 2018 Duncan impact fee update studies. 

Sincerely, 

Darla Letourneau
On behalf of
BikeWalkLee

cc: Roger Desjarlais, County Manager

Attachments:




Attachment  4:  Lee County/BoCC Approved Projects in 2040 LRTP





Thursday, January 4, 2018

BWL urges Lee Legislative Delegation to strengthen FL laws re: distracted driving

As the 2018 Florida Legislative session begins on January 9th, BikeWalkLee sent a letter to the Lee Legislative Delegation urging them to support legislation to strengthen laws against distracted driving, including passage this year of a bill (HB 33) to make texting while driving a primary offense. Add your voices by contacting members of the delegation.  
1/8/18 Update:  News-Press printed BWL's letter as on op ed in the Jan. 8th edition: "As fatalities surge, we urge strong no texting while driving law", by Darla Letourneau on behalf of BWL


1/10/18 Update: Good news...on Jan. 9th, the Florida House Transportation Committee unanimously approved SB 90 (companion bill to HB 33).  See News-Press article: Tougher texting-while-driving ban moves in Florida house, 1/10/18.



  January 4, 2018
Members of Lee County Legislative Delegation:

BikeWalkLee, a coalition raising public awareness and advocating for complete streets in Lee County, has long urged the Legislature to improve the safety of all road users in Florida.  In particular, our top legislative priority for the past five years has been passing a bill to strengthen Florida's laws dealing with distracted driving, in particular the weak “texting while driving” law.  As the 2018 legislative session begins, we urge you to strengthen roadway safety laws to address the growing dangers of distracted driving.  Specifically, we request that you co-sponsor the pending bill (HB 33) that would make texting while driving a primary offense.

Across the nation, overall traffic fatalities have surged in the past three years.  In Florida, traffic fatalities climbed by 21% between 2014 and 2016.  In Lee County, fatal traffic crashes increased much faster – 30% during the same two-year period, and to 43% during 2014 to 2017 (from preliminary 2017 data).  According to the Florida Dept. of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, there were almost 50,000 crashes involving distracted driving in Florida in 2016, and these crashes accounted for more than 3,500 serious injuries and 233 deaths.

Most experts agree that the primary cause of the surge in traffic fatalities is distracted driving, increasingly caused by the use of smartphones and internet apps.  According to the recent national “Safe Driving Report: 2016-2017” (issued by the insurance firm EverQuote Inc.), Florida ranked the second-worst state for distracted driving.

Recent studies show there is a relationship between individual state roadway safety rankings and that state’s driver safety laws and enforcement of those laws. While Florida is one of the most dangerous state in the country for road users, it ranks as the seventh worst state for driver safety laws (2016 study by the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety). While the Legislature finally adopted a “texting while driving” ban in 2012, it was a weak bill and only a first step in addressing this growing epidemic.  Florida is one of only four states that doesn't make texting while driving a primary offense.  Clearly, one of the reasons Florida's traffic fatalities are among the highest in the nation is that it has very weak driver safety laws in place. 

Florida's alarming increase in traffic fatalities is not only a concern for driver safety, it is of particular concern for vulnerable road users -- pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists -- who are at the greatest risk when drivers take their eyes off the road.  The national 2016 “Dangerous by Design” report ranked Florida as the most dangerous state in the country for pedestrians, and eight of the most dangerous metro areas in the U.S. are in Florida, with Lee County being ranked the most dangerous in the country!

This is a crisis that can no longer be ignored by the state of Florida.

It is critically important that the Legislature take action this year to address the growing dangers presented by the use of electronic devices while driving.  At a minimum, the Legislature must strengthen its current texting law so that texting while driving is made a primary offense.  In previous legislative sessions, bills have been introduced which made texting while driving a primary offense, doubled the fines, and provided enhanced penalties for violations when committed in a school zone or school crossing. However, in each of the past five years, the Legislature failed to take any action to strengthen its weak anti-texting law, and took no action to address the broader causes of distracted driving. 
 
For the 2018 session of the Legislature, a bill has already been introduced (HB 33) that would make texting while driving a primary offense.  We urge the Lee delegation to support HB 33 and work to ensure that the bill is enacted this year.  In addition, we encourage the Lee County Delegation to play a leadership role in pressing the Legislature to go beyond this texting bill and address more comprehensively the growing epidemic of distracted driving.

Thank you for your support. 
     /s/
Darla Letourneau
on behalf of BikeWalkLee

cc: Lee MPO Members

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Public input requested on Estero Parkway Improvement project

Do you want to make Estero Parkway a model complete street that demonstrates how one roadway can be redesigned to make it safer for all road users, esp. pedestrians and cyclists? If so, we need you to participate NOW in the Estero Parkway Improvement project getting underway in the Village of Estero, first by completing the Village's online survey about some of the options.

The Village of Estero is moving forward with plans to improve safety on Estero Parkway for all modes of transportation including vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians and are looking for your input. On May 22nd, the Village website posted the following message.
You can help design an improved Estero Parkway
The Village has developed a new webpage dedicated to the Estero Parkway Improvement Project so that you can be part of the planning process.

You may use this page to fill out the Resident Input Survey, prioritizing your selections for layout of the road, bike paths and landscaping. (link to Survey)

In addition, you may read about previous meetings where the project was discussed, see dates of upcoming meetings, review public presentations and, once the project has started, review the timeline for project completion.

Estero Parkway was selected as the Village’s first capital improvement project due to safety concerns with this heavily traveled road which has deteriorating pavement, missing sidewalks and a lack of bike paths.

Before starting this important project, the Village wants to hear how residents would prioritize the improvements to this major roadway.

The Village wants to make sure the community is engaged in the overall planning process as this project will set a precedent for upcoming projects

If there is any information you would like to see included regarding this project, please call 239-221-5035 or send an email to publicworks@estero-fl.gov.


Background

In March, at a Village Council workshop, council members reviewed the staff's proposed approach for developing the Estero Parkway Improvement project. BikeWalkLee sent a letter to the Village Council recommending a holistic complete streets approach for planning Estero Pkwy improvements, rather than the staff's proposed approach of treating as separate projects--the road, the off-road bike/ped facilities, and beautification ((landscaping, signage, and lighting). To create a complete street, all these components are part of the whole and must be designed together.

Here are a couple of key excerpts from the BWL letter:

"To create a "complete street" all these components are part of the whole and must be designed together. For example, roadway medians and landscaping designs are tools for traffic calming, not just aesthetics. In order for landscaping to enhance the safety of the roadway for all users, the choice of type of vegetation and its location need to be safety-driven. To determine the best mix of tools for traffic calming, all the tools--hardscape, streetscape, and landscape--must be considered together throughout the design process. "

" Streets play an enormous role in determining a place's quality of life. While people may not know the term "complete street", they know the characteristics of their favorite streets-- streets with tree canopy and attractive landscaping; safe, comfortable and shady places to walk and bike buffered from traffic; moderate traffic speeds, safe ways to cross the street, and inviting places to be for all kinds of uses. The holistic and integrated planning of a roadway (the entire right-of-way public space) is context sensitive and reflects balance among the needs of the various users."

See BWL's extensive blog with links from the March Council discussion.

Although no formal action was taken by the Council, the implementation plan as presented at the March meeting has proceeded, meaning that the 3 components of the project (road, off road bike/ped, and beautification) are not being designed together. At the May 17th Council meeting the project consultant made a presentation on only the road project, including various options for the width of travel lanes and bike lanes. BikeWalkLee is pleased to see that Alternative 3 (11 foot travel lanes and 7 foot bike lanes) reflects FDOT's new Complete Streets Policy.    (See consultant presentation)

BWL’s Estero rep Doug Saxton sent an email to the Village Council and Village Manager on May 22nd (link email) articulating our concerns and questions about how this project is being designed and asked that there be an opportunity for an evening public interactive workshop to get input on the various alternatives under consideration.
BWL's Doug Saxton at Village Council

Below is a key excerpt from the letter:

While we are pleased to see the Village following FDOT's new complete streets design standards for bike lanes, a complete streets approach would be holistic--considering how all the pieces interact (roadway, shared use path, landscaping, traffic calming, etc.) and choosing the package that best meets the goals of safety for all users and for connectivity purposes. If Alternative 3 is chosen as the choice for resurfacing and striping of the road, what is the impact on that choice for the options to be considered for the shared use path? Does it rule out the option of a linear park? Does it imply less landscaping buffer, etc.? Does it preclude roundabouts? What options does it foreclose with respect to crosswalks and traffic calming treatments? If the iterative planning approach isn't modified, can this roadway decision be modified once the alternatives for shared use paths are considered? And same question regarding landscaping? Will there be an opportunity to make this a model complete street even if you don't take the needed holistic approach? 


Complete Village's Online Survey
Your opinion matters. It is important that Village Council and staff hear from citizens that there is a desire for a complete street approach on Estero Pkwy. It is also important to realize that this is not just about Estero Pkwy. --the design of Estero Parkway will serve as the template for future road roadway projects in the Village.

BikeWalkLee encourages you to fill out this online survey, which asked you to vote on several options.  Because no explanation for any of these options are provided, we suggest that you read both the March and May BWL letters before you fill out the survey. While there are options for the width of the bike lanes, there are no options presented on the off-road bike/ped facilities (sidewalk, shared use path, linear park). As you review the options, please consider all users of the road, whether you are strictly a driver or you would love to bike and/or walk if you had a safe environment. The context of Complete Streets is that everyone is far safer when we each have our own space on the road.


There are also a series of questions asking you to rank order your interest in 4 criteria:
  • Safety
  • Beautification/landscaping
  • Cost
  • Speed of project completion
Clearly, BikeWalkLee places the highest priority on safety.

At the end, there is a section inviting your questions/comments/concerns, which we encourage you to fill out, since so much is lacking from this survey. Below are some additional thoughts for your consideration:

• The public should be solicited for input once the entire project has been presented and only after everyone has had a chance to see the options and talk to consultants at public workshop.

• Lane diet to help calm vehicle speeds closer to the 45 mph posted speed limit.

• Note: Three Oaks Pkwy is already 11’ with a speed limit of 45 mph. Narrowing the travel lanes on Estero Pkwy will not affect the capacity or speed limit.

• Wide bike lane 6-7’ to accommodate bicyclists that prefer to ride along the road for added visibility.

• Wide shared use path (off the road) of 10-12’ or linear park to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians of all ages and abilities.

• Other traffic calming measures such as roundabouts and landscaping. Potential roundabout locations on Estero Pkwy are:
• Cypress View and the Rookery community
• The Reserve and Cascades communities
• Walmart entrance/exit onto Estero Pkwy
• Street lighting for safety for those that bike or walk at night

Please share this with your friends utilizing any and all forms of social media so we can get the word out to people who live, work, or play in Estero, including FGCU students and facility.  You may also wish to send a letter to the Village Manager and/or Village Council members about your ideas and/or concerns related to the Estero Parkway Improvement project. (Steven Sarkozy: sarkozy@estero-fl.gov)

It is unclear what the next steps in the project are, but we'll keep you posted as soon as we hear about them. If you have any questions, please contact Doug Saxton: dpsaxton100@gmail.com.

Report by Doug Saxton and Darla Letourneau