BikeWalkLee supports the actions by Bonita
and BoCC to begin to move the road impact fees into a more multi-modal
transportation approach. The next step
needed is to move to mobility fees, which not only takes a multi-modal approach
in the use of the funds, but also provides a growth management tool to promote
infill and redevelopment and curtail sprawl.
Background
On July 15th, the Bonita Springs City Council adopted an
ordinance (Ordinance No. 15-16),
which amends the definition in the road impact fee ordinance to include
alternative roadway capacity improvements, similar to action taken by Lee
County BoCC in March. The Bonita Springs
ordinance further states that the Council will take further action as it moves
forward with implementation of its complete streets policies as part of its
upcoming EAR process.
This trend in providing more flexibility in use of road
impact fees for other transportation modes is not unique to Lee County. Just last week, the Tampa City Council took action on the same issue.
In the past, road
impact fees could only be used to build roads to meet the transportation needs
of the new developments and businesses.
Since road impact fees were put in place throughout Florida in the late
1980s and 1990s, there has been a major shift at the national, state, and local
level to a multi-modal transportation system, not just cars, to get people to
where they want to go. Thus, the road-only use of those funds is
inconsistent with this approach.
In the Lee County Comp Plan amendments (called Horizon 2035)
developed by staff and approved by all the relevant committees (with extensive
public input and involvement) over the period of 2010-2014, the Plan as
recommended to BoCC included incorporating a multi-modal transportation
approach, and moving away from road-only transportation approaches, such as auto-only
Level of Service (LOS) and road impact fees.
The draft Comp Plan amendments envisioned a mobility plan and mobility
fee approach as a replacement for road impact fees. [Note: this BoCC has taken no action on the
Horizon 2035 Plan and has given no indication that they plan to consider it.]
As part of the County's deliberations on impact fees, in
January, Duncan and Associates updated
the impact fees to reflect current costs, as required by State law. Their January report on road impact fees had
a section on multi-modal improvements (p. 16-13), which
reviewed the County Commission's
discussions about transitioning to a mobility fee and recommended that the
ordinance be amended to provide flexibility to spend road impact fees on
improvements such as sidewalks, bikeways, trails and bus pull-out lanes that
are not part of a road widening project. Thus, road impact fees may be used to fund
additional improvements as long as they expand the capacity of the
roadway. Like the current impact fee
system, the projects funded must be in the impact fee district within which the
fees were collected.
Including this new definition resulted in a
lowering of the County's net road impact fee. That's because including
stand-alone bike/ped improvements meant that the revenue credits increased,
i.e., you can reduce costs by taking some of the trips off the road and instead
putting them on biking/walking/transit facilities; thereby lowering the net
road impact fee.
As we pointed out to the BoCC in our public comments on
March 3rd, there are several recent
developments that could have benefited from this flexibility language--Fiddlesticks Blvd, Palomino Rd, and Estero
Parkway. Instead of taking some of
the trips off the road with needed walking and biking facilities at the time the housing developments were built, the Fiddlesticks
community, for example, has had to wait 10 plus years at 10 times the cost to
provide these needed transportation facilities, and communities along Palomino Rd. and Estero Parkway
probably have another 5-10 year wait. It's
a win-win for everyone to have this flexibility language.
Click here for BikeWalkLee's Jan. 29, 2015 letter to BoCC
stating our support for this provision.
Click here for the Lee County March 3, 2015 ordinance (Ordinance 15-03) with
new flexibility language.
BikeWalkLee will be tracking the implementation of this new
flexibility language and will report on the use of this language to provide
bike/ped/transit infrastructure on transportation projects necessitated by
growth. We also encourage the County and
Bonita Springs (and other local jurisdictions) to consider taking the next step--replacing
road impact fees with a mobility fee system.
Report by Darla
Letourneau
No comments:
Post a Comment
BikeWalkLee is not responsible for the validity of any comment posted at this site and has the right to remove any comment at any time.